shedfire’s dumping ground

This site is where I dump stuff for fast site updates - Go to http://www.shedfire.com for more 
« Back to blog

Updated :: Reach and Stack

It's the new way, apparently. Makes sense!


See more here - http://www.sicklines.com/2008/12/18/reach-and-stack-a-good-idea/

Centre of the BB to the top of the head tube - horizontal and vertical = reach and stack.

You need a plumb bob.

Here's what numbers come out, unsagged on a Ragley mmmbop, Ti or Blue Pig.


UPDATED ::(I got a new version of the very ace BIKECAD which gave more accurate dimensions).

16in - 23in top tube, 73deg seat angle.
reach = 390mm, stack = 576mm (140mm fork)
reach = 378mm, stack = 584mm (160mm fork)

18in - 23.5in top tube, 73.5deg seat angle.
reach = 408mm, stack = 576mm (140mm fork)
reach = 396mm, stack = 584mm (160mm fork)

20in - 24in top tube, 74deg seat angle
reach = 424mm, stack = 581mm (140mm fork)
reach = 413mm, stack = 589mm (160mm fork).

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (4)

Oct 27, 2009
Chipps said...
It only really makes sense on bikes where you stand up all/most of the time. For jump and DH bikes though, it's great.
Oct 27, 2009
Brant said...
I think you're half right. If I'm being nice.

Combined with top tube length, it gives a much better idea of bike fit. People always fluff seat angle, and this gets around the "size a bike by the top tube length" thing. there's a half inch top tube length difference between the frames, but half a degree too - so it adds up more. 


Oct 28, 2009
Jason WD said...
Maybe there should be a third 'Sit' measurement?
Oct 28, 2009
 said...
I cannot WAIT till my mmmBop arrives so I can flog it out...

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter